Based on this week’s learning, there are various ways to
assess students in collaborative learning environments. The assessment tool
should be fair and able to assess the learning objective. A rubric should be developed
for each learning task. The rubric is a tool that will display to the learner
the requirements of each assignment. It can be used a checklist for the learner
and a way for the learner to assess their own work before submission. Rubric
helps to eliminate any misunderstanding because all of the requirements are
listed for the learner. According to Pallof and Pratt, “This activity not only
provides a realistic picture of how a student interacted with course material
and their peers, it also reduces the possibilities of grade inflation,
dissatisfaction and grade appeals by providing evaluative material that is
objective and quantifiable”(2005,p.44). The
instructor can take into consideration the amount of contribution the learner
added to the environment and the quality of the work the learner produce when
assessing collaborative assignments, but it should be listed on a rubric as
well. The use of a rubric is one of the best tools to used helps to eliminate
the possibility of being graded objectively.
When groups are form for collaboration roles should be
assigned to each group member. Each member knows his or her responsibility for
the group assignment. The instructor should be aware of each group’s member
role. The instructor should monitor each group member’s participation
regularly. If necessary the instructor will have to address a students lacks of
participation. Swan states, “ make participation in discussion a
significant part of the course grades”(2004,p.2). If its stated that participation will be a
major part of the student’s grade may courage students to participate
more. Since participation is part of the
rubric the student grade will suffer due to the lack of participation.
Palloff,
R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: Learning together
in community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Alicia:
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that the distribution of task on a collective project should facilitate individual and group assessment.